From these exiled souls, the era of confinement followed where they were housed in monasteries, prisons, or way-stations. Many of these souls were chained as animals in appalling conditions which would get us convicted if we treated our dogs similarly today. By medicalizing madness, we presumably move from moral derision to scientific categories of etiology, nosology, and treatment plans. More titles may be available to you. Sign in to see the full collection.
By the time an abridged English edition was published in as Madness and Civilization, Michel Foucault had shaken the intellectual world. This translation is the first English edition of the complete French texts of the first and second edition, including all prefaces and appendices, some of them unavailable in the existing French edition.
History of Madness begins in the Middle Ages with vivid descriptions of the exclusion and confinement of lepers. Why, Foucault asks, when the leper houses were emptied at the end of the Middle Ages, were they turned into places of confinement for the mad? Why, within the space of several months in , was one out of every hundred people in Paris confined? He also urges us to recognize the creative and liberating forces that madness represents, brilliantly drawing on examples from Goya, Nietzsche, Van Gogh and Artaud.
The History of Madness is an inspiring and classic work that challenges us to understand madness, reason and power and the forces that shape them. History Philosophy Sociology Nonfiction. This book belongs to the few which demonstrate how skillful, sensitive scholarship uses history to enrich, deepen, and reveal new avenues for thought and investigation.
Foucault animates one facet of the problem after the other, he always keeps them related to each other. The end of the Middle Ages emphasized the comic, but just as often the tragic aspect of madness, as in Tristan and Iseult, for example.
Nothing is more illuminating than to follow with M. Foucault the many threads which are woven in this complex book, whether it speaks of changing symptoms, commitment procedures, or treatment. In the middle of the twelfth century, France had more than 2, leprosarioms, and England and Scotland for a population of a million and a half people.
History of Madness nevertheless provides a wealth of analysis beyond compare, which has opened up new fields of research by playing a part in undermining some of the foundations of Western culture. This gave him the opportunity to observe the effects of psychiatric knowledge and the power of medicine. In , he recalled those years of training in the following words: Not being a doctor, I had no rights, but being a student and not a patient, I was free to wander. Thus, without ever having to exercise the power related to psychiatric knowledge, I could nonetheless observe it all the time.
I was a surface of contact between the patients, with whom I would talk, under the pretext of carrying out psychological tests, and the medical staff, who came by regularly to make decisions. What counts for me is the investigation of the very origins of madness.
The good conscience of psychiatrists disappointed me. One doubts that it will be a simple matter of one text replacing the other.
Already in the title, multiple texts appear. Taken from a interview p. Is anything gained by this brevity? Is anything lost? Probably not. Here, the brief title History of Madness may be misleading. And yet part of the fascination exerted by this text is that it evokes something variously called madness, folly, insanity, precisely not as an object but as an Other to something else called reason, and this for a certain period and in a certain place principally the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe.
The current title of the French text itself the original subtitle makes this clear, as does the tripartite division of the complete text a division not reproduced in Madness and Civilization. On this point, the new translation by Jonathan Murphy and Jean Khalfa proves sometimes to be a hindrance to a full appreciation. Gothic forms lived on, but little by little they fell silent, ceasing to speak, to recall or instruct. The forms remained familiar, but all understanding was lost, leaving nothing but a fantastical presence; and freed from the wisdom and morality it was intended to transmit, the image began to gravitate around its own insanity.
What these translations, and other passages like them, lack is the full force of the evocative tone of the original which is intent on opening us to a perspective too quickly cast in rationalizing and normalizing form including the rationalizing and normalizing form of historical development.
Much of the text describes the ways in which the classical age transforms madness such that, for it: Madness becomes a form related to reason, or more precisely madness and reason enter into a perpetually reversible relationship which implies that all madness has its own reason by which it is judged and mastered, and all reason has its madness in which it finds its own derisory truth.
Each is a measure of the other, and in this movement of reciprocal reference, each rejects the other but is logically dependent on it.
Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, Vol. In their debate surrounding History of Madness, they mutually accuse each other of fostering authoritarian thought.
0コメント